Legal Opinion
U.S. Bank Natl. Assn. v. Franko
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 22, 2018No. 105832PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J.:
{¶ 1} Mary Claire Franko and Charles Stimac, Jr. ("mortgagors") appeal the decree of foreclosure on the property at 33400 Pinetree Road, Pepper Pike, Ohio. We affirm.
{¶ 2} Franko executed a promissory note for $300,000, secured by a mortgage signed by both Franko and Stimac in 2005. The complete mortgage instrument named RBC Mortgage Company as the lender and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") as the mortgagee and as nominee for RBC Mortgage Company and its successor and assigns. The loan was immediately securitized 1 and placed into trust, the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Comer v. RiskoOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Bonacorsi v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. NajarOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lorrie Thompson v. Bank of America, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- U.S. Bank National Association v. MarcinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sterling Contracting, L.L.C. v. Main Event Entertainment, L.P.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Cuyahoga Cty. Treasurer v. Heirs of WeisnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Cuyahoga Cty. Treasurer v. Unknown Heirs of RussellOhio Court of Appeals · 2023