Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Meier
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided October 18, 2002No. 00-P-1163PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRapoza, J.
The defendant, claiming the trial judge erroneously denied her motion for a required finding of not guilty, appeals from her conviction of threatening to commit a crime in violation of G. L. c. 275, § 2. We affirm.
Background. Brigitte Meier and Norman Erlich, an attorney, first met in 1994 when Erlich was representing the board of trustees of Foxcroft Manor Condominium, where Meier resided. Erlich filed a lawsuit on behalf of the board in the Middlesex *279Superior Court, seeking to enjoin Meier from venturing onto the roof of her condominium building and from interfering with repair work being…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RobicheauMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
- Commonwealth v. ElliffeMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- Commonwealth v. Troy T.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. DitschMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. WaltersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- Commonwealth v. MaidenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. HokansonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. HughesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.