Commonwealth v. Hokanson
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
After a jury-waived trial in the District Court, the defendant appeals from his convictions of disturbing the peace, G. L. c. 272, § 53, and threatening to commit a crime, G. L. c. 275, § 2. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case, the defendant moved for a required finding of not guilty, but only as to the charge of threatening to commit a crime. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence of both convictions.1 We affirm.
*4041. Facts. We rehearse the facts in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, see Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979), omitting some details that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. OrlandoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Commonwealth v. McGovernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. SholleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ZapelliMassachusetts Superior Court · 2014
- Commonwealth v. YoungMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
- Commonwealth v. Basil B.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. McgillivaryMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2023
- Commonwealth v. Nicholas AkerbergMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.