Legal Opinion

United States v. Adamita

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 14, 1988No. SS 88 Cr. 217 (JES)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SPRIZZO, District Judge:

The Court is faced with the issue of whether an employer can be required to pay an alternate juror while she serves in that capacity during the course of this trial. The employer has indicated to the Court that it will not pay the juror. The juror has indicated to the Court that since she provides the sole support for her children, it would constitute an extreme hardship for her to serve if she were not paid her full salary during the pendency of the trial. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that it has the power to order the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Claudio Calderone, and Domenico Catalano, A/K/A "Micu"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Claudio Calderone and Domenico CatalanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. Bothwell v. Republic Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1995
  4. U.S. Ex Rel. Madonia v. Coral Springs Partnership, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
  5. United States v. GambinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API