Legal Opinion

Impervious Paint Industries, Inc. v. Ashland

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided February 9, 1981No. Civ. A. C 78-0068 L(A), C 78-0069 L(A) and C 79-0656 L(A)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALLEN, Chief Judge.

These consolidated multiple-defendant civil anti-trust actions are proceeding by way of class action. Although the senior action was filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in late 1977 and transferred to this Court in early 1978, procedural problems have slowed the progress of the suit such that notice to the more than 1,300 class members has only recently been sent. The present submission arises from alleged impropriety on the part of one of the defendants with regard to contacts of class members. After careful consideration, we are of the opinion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. 23 Fair empl.prac.cas. 20, 23 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,029 Wesley P. Bernard v. Gulf Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Community Bank of Northern VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  3. Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Hamilton v. Ohio Sav. BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re School Asbestos LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API