Legal Opinion

Corwise v. Lefrak Organization

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2012PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ritholtz, J.), entered January 25, 2011, as granted the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend the amended complaint to increase the ad damnum clause.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In general, motions for leave to amend a pleading should be granted unless the proposed amendment is “palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit, or where the delay in seeking the amendment would cause…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. Commissioners of State Insurance v. Service Unlimited, USA, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. Kushner v. Queens Transit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. PUTRELO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. TOWN OF MARCYAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Putrelo Construction Co. v. Town of MarcyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Putrelo Construction Co. v. Town of MarcyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API