Legal Opinion
Hillenbrand v. 3801 Review Place, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 15, 1979PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 6, 1978, which denied their motion to increase the ad damnum clause of the complaint. Order reversed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable jointly by respondents and motion granted. Since plaintiffs’ motion to amend is based solely upon an update of original injuries, compliance with the affidavit requirement of London v Moore (32 AD2d 543) was unnecessary (see Church v Catholic Med. Center of Brooklyn & Queens, 52 AD2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- London v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Calautti v. National Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Deloris Church v. Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dolan v. Garden City Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Korolyk v. BlagmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Fahy v. Hertz Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cardone v. University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Carlisle v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.