Legal Opinion

Schaad v. Simms

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1992No. S-85-719PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Dee E. and Kathryn J. Schaad filed a tort action against David B. Simms, D.B.S. Enterprises, Inc., and Lincoln Bank South. When the district court sustained the demurrer of Lincoln Bank South concerning Schaads’ amended petition, the court entered the following in its docket notes: “Plaintiff is given 14 days to file second amended petition or to select to stand on amended petition, in which instance the defendant Lincoln Bank South will stand dismissed from this action without further hearing.” Schaads declined to further amend and, instead, filed a motion for new trial, which was overruled.

S…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gruenewald v. WaaraNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Maddux v. MadduxNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Fritch v. FritchNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Schoneweis v. DandoNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stenberg v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Strunk v. Chromy-StrunkNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Deuth v. RatiganNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dunning v. TallmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Custom Fabricators of Granite & Marble Inc. v. LenarduzziNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API