Legal Opinion

Lehr v. Guild

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 1, 1922No. 10,103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action to recover proceeds from the sale of promissory Dotes. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Clarence J. Morley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Suit was by Frank H. Guild, to recover $900.00 and interest alleged to be due from Earl H. Lehr, as the proceeds from the sale of certain notes owned by Guild and alleged to have been sold by Lehr on the latter’s account. The answer denied generally the facts alleged in the complaint. Also it set up a separate defense in bar of the action, alleging that prior to this suit Guild had commenced and prosecuted to final judgment another action against defendant involving the same facts and transaction. Plaintiff demurred to this defense which the court sustained. The cause was then tried upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peppers v. MetzlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Lowe v. HowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API