Jones v. Ceramco, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PLATT, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss the complaint herein contending that the first claim for patent infringement is barred under the doctrine of estoppel and laches and the second claim for breach of confidential relationship by defendant employees with the plaintiff and misappropriation of plaintiff’s trade secrets is barred by thl*'New York statute of limitations and also by the doctrine of equitable estoppel and laches and further that plaintiff has no trade secrets because any and all of the same have been publicly disclosed in plaintiff’s patent issued and published…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Monolith Portland Midwest Company, a Nevada Corporation v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Everett Heyman D/B/A Pleasure Products Co. v. Ar. Winarick, Inc., Ar. Winarick, Inc., Dura-Gloss Division, Jules Winarick and Hugo L. BellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Sachs v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Koehring Company v. National Automatic Tool Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M & T Chemicals, Inc. v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Jones v. Ceramco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1975