Legal Opinion
Clark v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 13, 1991No. 91-1126-CIVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING ACTION
MORENO, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. The Court has considered the pleadings, oral argument by counsel for both parties, the pertinent portions of the record, and the applicable law. For the reasons that follow, the motion to remand is granted.
I
Plaintiff Clark sued defendant UPS in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Dade County, Florida, for compensatory relief for the loss of two packages shipped from Guyana to England. The packages, which contained pound sterling currency, were valued at…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Air France v. SaksSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hunter v. United Van LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- In Re Mexico City Aircrash of October 31, 1979 Consolidated Proceedings. Gary Steve Haley, as Heir and of Deceased Theresa Yoriko Sugano Haley, Gary Steven Haley, Special Administrator for the Estate of Theresa Yoriko Sugano Haley v. Western Airlines, Inc., Blanca Estela Paz Tovar, Heir and of Deceased Regina Patricia Tovar Blanca Estela Paz Tovar, Special Administrator for the Estate of Regina Patricia Tovar, Anthony John Dzida, as Heir and of Deceased Vikki Dzida, Anthony John Dzida, Special Administrator for the Estate of Vikki Dzida, Plaintiff v. Western Airlines, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, McDonnell Douglas Company, Inc., a Maryland Corporation Estate of Charles Gilbert Sperry-Rand, Inc., Sunstrand Data Control, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Bendix Corporation, Flight Systems Division, a Delaware Corporation Rockwell International, Inc. Collins Air Transport Division, a Foreign Corporation Thompson, C.F.S., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- The Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Company, Limited, Plaintiffs- Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, and Third-Party Plaintiff- Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Japan Air Lines Co., Ltd., Third-Party Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Boehringer-Mannheim Diagnostics, Inc., F/k/a Hycel, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campos v. Sociedad Aeronautica De Medellin Consolidada, S.A.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
- Jack v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1993
- Da Rosa v. Tap Air PortugalDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Air Express International, Inc. v. Aerovias De Mexico S.A. De C.V.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1997
- Cawthard v. Flagship Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.