Legal Opinion
Hunter v. United Van Lines
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 5, 1984No. 83-5911PublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs filed suit in state court against a common carrier and its independent contractors. They presented a claim under the Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S.C. § 11707 (Supp. V 1981), seeking damages for injuries to their property caused by the common carrier. They also presented state-law claims for fraud in the negotiation of the contract of carriage and for bad faith and intentional infliction of emotional distress in connection with the defendants’ handling of the damage claims. Defendant common carrier removed the case to federal district court, arguing that the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- City of Oakland v. Bp P.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Takeda v. Northwestern National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Harriet M. Gould, an Unremarried Widow v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ruth L. Young v. Anthony's Fish Grottos, Inc. Anthony's Fish Grotto of La Jolla Anthony's Fish Grotto of La Mesa, Inc. And Ida TagliaferriCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.