Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman Nuñez

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2012No. Nos. 85789-0; 85947-7PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiggins, J.

f 1 The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires that a jury must unanimously find beyond a reasonable doubt any aggravating circumstances that increase a defendant’s sentence. In Washington, a jury uses special verdict forms to find these aggravating circumstances. In State v. Bashaw, 169 Wn.2d 133, 234 P.3d 195 (2010), we held in part that a jury may reject a special finding on an aggravating circumstance even if the jurors are not unanimous.1 In these two consolidated cases, the trial court instructed the jury that it must be unanimous to either accept or reject the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. LamarWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. State v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State v. KusterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API