Legal Opinion

State v. Black

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 7, 1999No. C96-1890CR; CA A97307PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant seeks to modify the sentences he received after he was convicted of unlawful possession of a short-barreled shotgun, ORS 166.272, and unlawful use of a weapon, ORS 166.220. Both convictions were pleaded as aggravated offenses committed with the use of or threatened use of a firearm, ORS 161.610. The court sentenced defendant to two concurrent minimum terms for crimes that arose from the same incident and were sentenced at the same time. ORS 161.610. Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in sentencing him to two minimum sentences.

Despite the fact that the error was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HardestyOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. Nghia Gia DamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. VON MELKERCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API