Legal Opinion

State v. Hardesty

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1985No. C 83-01-30043; CA A29048; C 83-02-30852; CA A29206; SC S30984PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

In a consolidated petition, the state seeks review of two decisions of the Court of Appeals interpreting the statutory provision for imposing minimum terms of imprisonment on persons who use or threaten to use a firearm in the commission of a felony.

The statute in question provides that when a defendant has used or threatened to use a firearm during the commission of a crime, the court shall impose at least a minimum term of imprisonment “as provided in subsection (5) of this section.” ORS 161.610(4). Subsection (5) provides:

“(5) The minimum terms of imprisonment for felony convictions in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HardestyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. State v. BrowderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Jude Somerset HardestyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. State v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. State v. Quintero-MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. MedinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API