Legal Opinion

Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 17, 2009PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant had partially paid plaintiff’s claim prior to the commencement of the action. At trial, the parties stipulated to plaintiff’s prima facie case and further agreed that defendant had timely denied the unpaid portion of the claim on the ground that the charges for acupuncture treatments exceeded the maximum fees under the appropriate fee schedule. Additionally, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the claim form and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walt v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
  2. AVA Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. East Coast Acupuncture, P.C. v. Hereford InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2016
  2. AL Acupuncture, P.C. v. Geico Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  3. AL Acupuncture, P.C. v. Praetorian Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  4. Acuhealth Acupuncture, P.C. v. Ameriprise Ins. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2017
  5. Acupuncture Healthcare Plaza I, P.C. v. Truck Ins. Exch.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API