Legal Opinion
Walt v. GEICO General Insurance
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 24, 2007PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Judgment reversed without costs, order granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment vacated, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied, and, upon searching the record, summary judgment granted in favor of defendant dismissing the action.
In this action to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff health care provider moved for summary judgment. In an affirmation in support of the motion, plaintiffs counsel stated that plaintiff billed defendant for 35 sessions of acupuncture with its licensed acupuncturist at a rate of $90 per session, for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Merritt Hill Vineyards Inc. v. Windy Heights Vineyard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Medical Society v. SerioNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MallelaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. New York State Department of InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Great Wall Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2009
- AVA Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
- Complete Orthopedic Supplies, Inc. v. State Farm InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2007
- Surgicare Surgical v. National Interstate InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 2014
- AVA Acupuncture, P.C. v. GEICO General InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.