Legal Opinion
Samissa Anchorage, Inc. v. Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 2002No. S-10258PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The State of Alaska made additional payments to a medical services provider after the provider brought successful administrative claims against the state to increase the Medicaid reimbursement rates payable under AS 47.07.070. Does AS 09.50.280 require the state to pay the provider “prejudgment interest”? Because the provider’s claims under AS 47.07.070 are not covered by AS 09.50.250’s waiver of sovereign immunity, we hold that the state is not liable for prejudg ment interest under AS 09.50.280. We therefore affirm the superior court’s denial of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stewart & Grindle, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Danco Exploration, Inc. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Justice v. RMH Aero Logging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
3Cited by6 opinions
- Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Midwest Division-Oprmc, LLC v. Dept. Soc. Serv., Div. of Medical ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hawken Northwest, Inc. v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. ALASKA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ASS'NAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Quality Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.