Legal Opinion

Pewitt v. Renwar Oil Corp.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 11, 1953No. 6695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice.

Appellants have filed a vigorous motion for rehearing, asserting, of course, that we have committed many egregious errors in our opinion, to which the ■ motion is addressed. We have carefully re-examined the record during vacation and a great number of the 200-odd authorities cited in their original brief, together with those cited in their motion for rehearing. This study has in nowise affected our conclusion expressed in our original opinion. However, we have decided to re-write our opinion so as to correct some misstatements contained therein and to make certain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Calcasieu Lumber Co. v. HarrisTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Brightwell v. International-Great Northern RailroadTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Coleman v. WaddellTexas Supreme Court · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Webb v. British American Oil Producing CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  2. S. H. Oil & Royalty Co. v. Texas & New Orleans RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Ivarene and Victor Hosek v. Rosale Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
  4. Ivarene and Victor Hosek v. Rosale Scott, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API