Legal Opinion

Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. Amason

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 20, 1924No. 2273. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRandolph, J.

>' This is the third time that this case has been before this eourt. The published opinions on former appeals will be found in 239 S. W. 359, and 249 S. W. 1090.

Appellant has assigned many errors on which the former opinions, above referred to, held against its contentions, and we will therefore discuss only such assignments as present questions that have not heretofore been decided in this case, and that are of such consequence as to be material.

The trial court submitted to the jury issue No. 1, “Did the defendant’s locomotive engines 153 and 302, or either of them, set fire' to the grass on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Texas Refining Co. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  2. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. HooserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  2. Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. HugheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Smith v. ChipleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Thompson v. ShifflettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API