Legal Opinion

St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Hooser

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 17, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Grayson County.

1Opinion of the Court

RAIHEY, Chibe Justice.

This suit was brought by appellee, of the Indian Territory, to recover of appellant the sum of $1,500, the value of certain cotton alleged to have been burned at Troy, Indian Territory, by sparks emitted from defendant’s engine. A trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiff and the defendant appeals.

The first assignment is: “The court erred in not sustaining the challenge for cause of defendant to the juror, Carter, and in forcing defendant to use a peremptory challenge to strike said Carter from the panel.”

The cause for challenge shown by defendant’s bill of exceptions is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. AddisonTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Belcher v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Couts v. NeerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  5. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. MannsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Smith v. ChipleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Trinity & B. v. Ry. Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Wiess v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. AmasonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API