Christopher v. Searcy
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 38 — ON PETITION ON PETITION POR A REHEARING- IN COURT OP APPEALS.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters
This court must try and dispose of cases upon records as submitted.' If the practice is to be indulged of granting rehearings after a careful examination of records and after delivering opinions on them as presented, because it is afterward discovered that the records were incomplete, the labors of the court, already burdensome beyond measure, will be greatly in*172creased; and it would seem to offer a premium for inattention on the part of the profession in the preparation of their cases. It has been repeatedly held by this court that for a discovery of a diminution of the record after the case…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. North East Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Miller Creek Railroad v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Meyers v. SaltryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Leonard's Adm'r v. CowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
- Yeager v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880