Yeager v. Groves
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 58—EQUITY APPEAL FROM LOUISVILLE CHANCERY COURT. 1. The process is a continuous direction to the marshal, beginning with a summons and ending with the order of attachment. It is one instrument. (Civil Code, sec. 732.) 2. Appellant was not bound to accept the tender of the money by appellee. It was not the amount due to appellant. (Ray v. Lawrence, 8. Dana, 81; Gen. Slat., 255.) 3. The chancellor erred in adjudging costs against appellant.
1Opinion
To a petition for rehearing—
JUDGE COFER
delivered the response of the court.
This court decided in Christopher v. Searcy (12 Bush, 171), that a rehearing would not be granted in order to-enable the parties to perfect the transcript, and the same-thing has been decided in numerous unreported cases.
Petition overruled.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Christopher v. SearcyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876