Legal Opinion

Cady v. Pitts

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1981No. 12871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This was originally an action by Consolidated American Securities Holding, Inc. (CASH) and Water Refining Company, Inc. against defendants and cross-claimants Cadys and against defendants and cross-claimants Pitts and Scheu. The original litigation grew out of the sale of the Cadys’ water conditioning business to Pitts and Scheu, and, among other relief, CASH sought and obtained injunctive relief preventing the conduct of that business by Pitts and Scheu. After the original complaints were dismissed prior to trial, the trial court heard the cross-claim of the Cadys against…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russ v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Rowe v. BurrupIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lowe v. LymIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Barnard & Son, Inc. v. AkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Child v. BlaserIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Hoopes v. HoopesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Harter v. Products Management Corp.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API