Legal Opinion
Hoopes v. Hoopes
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 21, 1993No. 19855PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Judge.
This appeal is based on an action by Melvin and Ardell Hoopes, husband and wife, against Lowell and Loni Hoopes, husband and wife. 1 Melvin acted as a cosigner and guarantor on a promissory note for his brother Lowell. Melvin pledged four certificates of deposit as security for the loan. Lowell eventually defaulted on the loan, and the certificates of deposit were seized to satisfy the loan. Melvin brought this action to recover the loss. At trial, the district court, sitting without a jury, determined that Melvin had acquired all the rights of the lending bank through…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Caito v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- May Trucking Co. v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Kawai Farms, Inc. v. LongstreetIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Gilbert v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Williams v. JohnstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sword v. SweetIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Dennett v. KuenzliIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
- N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Depue v. Cox (In re Cox)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2011
- Davis v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.