Legal Opinion
Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane Houston Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 9, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Standard Fashion Company against the Magrane Houston Company.
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Circuit Judge.
November 25, 1914, the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant, containing, among others, the following provisions:
“The first party hereof grants to second party an agency for the sale of Standard patterns for their store in the city of Boston, state of Massachusetts, for a term of two years from date hereof, and from term to term thereafter until this agreement is terminated, as hereinafter provided, and agrees to sell and deliver f. o. b. New York or at its branch office in Boston, Mass., to second party, Standard patterns, at a discount of 50 per cent,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Straus v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mathews Conveyer Co. v. Palmer-Bee Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
- S. B. McMaster, Inc. v. Chevrolet Motor Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1925
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Burkhalter v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.