Legal Opinion
Odell v. City of Eagan
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 8, 1984No. C8-83-1623PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellants submitted applications for waiver of plat and for preliminary plat approval to the Eagan City Council, with the intent of subdividing their residential lot. Both applications were denied by the council after separate hearings. The trial court dismissed appellants’ subsequent declaratory judgment action, and denied their motion for amended findings. Appellants claim their applications were improperly denied and that they are entitled to compensatory damages under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1988 (1976). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellants David and Patricia Odell own…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Contos v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lantz v. Santa Fe Extraterritorial Zoning AuthorityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
- City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Larson v. County of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Application of OrrCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Tuckner v. Township of MayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.