Legal Opinion

Jim Walter Corp. v. Green

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 8, 1966No. 6 Div. 389PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

In a statutory suit to quiet title, the jury returned a verdict for one of the respondents. The circuit court, on motion, rendered a decree “non obstante veredicto” for complainant, and the respondent, for whom verdict was returned, appeals.

Complainant commenced the suit by filing bill of complaint alleging that he “is in peaceable possession of. . . . claiming to own. ... in his own right,” the

“SW j4 °f NW 54 °f Section 27, Township 9, Range 14, . . . .”

in Marion County; and that respondents claim some interest in or encumbrance upon the land. Complainant called upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Carr v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alabama Equity Corporation v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970
  2. Ex Parte Jim Walter CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  3. Jim Walter Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Alabama Equity Corporation v. HallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API