Legal Opinion

Oelkers v. Hulseberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1951PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.

Motion by defendants for a change of venue.

Defendants are residents of Chenango County. Plaintiffs concededly reside in Union City, New Jersey. They claim, however, that they also reside at Huntington Station, Suffolk County, where they have brought this action.-

Plaintiffs have resided in Union City, New Jersey, for about two years. As recently as March 17, 1951, and April 21, 1951, the plaintiffs gave a Union City address as their residence when applying for automobile drivers’ licenses. A post card mailed by the plaintiff wife to the defendant wife from Jersey City on April 17, 1951, bears…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Union Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  2. Washington v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Katz v. SirotyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Mandelbaum v. MandelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Hammerman v. Louis Watch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Enter v. CrutcherAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1958
  5. Enter v. CrutcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API