White v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HARPER, Judge.
—We do not deem it necessary to discuss but one question, it being presented in bill of exception No. 1. At the conclusion, of the testimony offered on behalf of the State, the defendant announced he would introduce, no testimony but would demur to the testimony. In the discussion of the demurrer a difference arose between the State’s counsel and defendant’s attorney as to what a »witness, Mr. Ford, had testified. The defendant’s counsel being convinced that the witness had not testified as claimed by the prosecuting attorney, stated he was laboring under an honest belief that "…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Peek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Gobella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Sturgeon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003