Legal Opinion
Peek v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided May 21, 2003No. 2377-01, 2378-01PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
106 S.W.3d 72 (2003)
Rosana and Robert Dale PEEK, Appellants,
v.
The STATE of Texas.
Nos. 2377-01, 2378-01.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
May 21, 2003.
John H. Hagler, Dallas, for Appellant.
Susan Hawk, Asst. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for State.
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.
Rosana and Robert Dale Peek were tried together for injuring their daughter. After both sides closed, the defense sought to reopen the case. The judge denied the request. The appellate court found no error because the Peeks did not demonstrate that "the evidence would have materially changed the case." The Peeks contest the…
3Cases cited51 opinions
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by100 opinions
- Pena, Jose LuisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- Sierra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Hayden v. Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
- Norris Shannon Baines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
- William Gilmore v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.