Micale v. Pumphret
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
Keniston, G. J.
The plaintiff seeks to recover for injuries sustained by being struck by a piece of metal which came from apparatus being used by the defendant in raising a disabled truck. The plaintiff was standing on the sidewalk watching the defendant and in the exercise of due care.
*73There was evidence from which the court could have found the following facts:
The defendant backed a wrecking truck in front of a disabled truck. The truck was equipped for lifting and towing disabled cars with a winch, steel cable and chain. There was an eye bolt at the end of the cable. The defendant used a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Griffin v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Semerjian v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- McNamara v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Commonwealth v. PearMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
- Roscigno v. Colonial Beacon Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.