Legal Opinion
State v. Tulee
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 1941No. 28079PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Defendant herein, Sampson Tulee, a member of the Yakima tribe of Indians, was charged by information filed in the superior court for Klicki-tat county, Washington, with the offense of having, May 6, 1939, caught salmon and food fish with a dip bag net, and with selling commercially the fish which he had caught, all without first having obtained a license to fish, as required by Rem. Rev. Stat. (Sup.), § 5703 [P. C. § 2460], Laws of 1937, chapter 149, p. 529, § 1.
Tulee claiming that, under the treaty of June 9, 1855 (12 U. S. Stat. 951), he, as a member of the Yakima tribe of Indians, had the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Geer v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Johnson & Graham's Lessee v. McIntoshSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tulee v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- State v. MosesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. SatiacumWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. McClureMontana Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. McConvilleIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.