Legal Opinion
State v. Satiacum
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1957No. 33545PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
50 Wn.2d 513 (1957)
314 P.2d 400
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant,
v.
ROBERT SATIACUM et al., Respondents.[1]
No. 33545.
The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
July 1, 1957.
John J. O'Connell, John A. Petrich, Keith D. McGoffin, and John G. McCutcheon, for appellant.
Malcom Stewart McLeod and Wing C. Luke, for respondents.
John J. O'Connell, Joseph T. Mijich, Nathan G. Richardson, Arthur Lazarus, Jr., and Theodore H. Little, amici curiae.
DONWORTH, J.
The only question presented on this appeal involves the right of defendants, who are Puyallup Indians, to fish on the Puyallup river during the closed…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.