City of Shreveport v. Bayse
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.
Alan Bayse and J. M. Cox were charged with violating subsection F of section 7 of Ordinance No. 158 of 1927 of the city of Shreveport.
The defendant Bayse was charged with three sepárate and distinct violations of subsection F of the ordinance and defendant Cox was similarly charged with two violations thereof, The five charges were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The trial was had and it resulted in the conviction and sentence of-each of the defendants upon each of said charges. Both defendants appealed.
Subsection F of section 7 of the ordinance 'follows:
• “Every master electrician, or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Le Blanc v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- State v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
3Cited by18 opinions
- Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
- City of Tucson v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Chapman v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Meyers v. City of Baton RougeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Archer v. City of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.