Legal Opinion

Odom v. International Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 6, 1984No. 41049PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, Justice.

This case is here on certiorari and involves use of OCGA § 33-34-5 (c) by insurers to correct any defects in automobile insurance applications for policies issued after March 1, 1975.

Odom’s policy was issued in August of 1977 and provided for $5,000 personal injury protection. The trial court granted summary judgment for Odom on the issue of his entitlement to an additional $45,000 coverage because the policy application form did not comply with OCGA § 33-34-5(b). See Flewellen v. Atlanta Cas. Co., 250 Ga. 709 (300 SE2d 673) (1983). The Court of Appeals reversed based upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flewellen v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Enfinger v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. International Indemnity Co. v. EnfingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  4. INTERNATIONAL INDEMNITY COMPANY v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. International Indemnity Co. v. OdomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. International Indemnity Co. v. EnfingerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API