Legal Opinion

Frischenmeyer v. Werholtz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 2, 2012No. 11-3291UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

MONROE G. McKAY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Michael J. Frischenmeyer, appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Mr. Frischenmeyer was incarcerated in Texas from 1994 until 2006, when he was released to mandatory supervision, agreeing to certain conditions of supervision, including waiver of extradition. The maximum expiration date of his mandatory supervision, if satisfactorily completed, was August 25, 2009.

Several days after his release, Mr. Fris-chenmeyer was sent…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Yang v. ArchuletaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Steele v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  4. Federated Rural Electric Insurance Corporation v. Kootenai Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C. v. StidhamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Clear Spring Property & Casualty Company v. Arch Nemesis, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
  2. Kenneth M. Chandler v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
  3. Leonite Fund I, LP v. Hawaii Brewery Development Co., Inc.; Waiakea Bottling Inc.; Waiakea Inc; and Marcus I BenderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
  4. Wise v. Arapahoe County Department of Human Services, TheDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API