Legal Opinion
Matthew Ward v. Lowe's
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 2017No. Court of Appeals Case 93A02-1609-EX-2133PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Bradford, Judge.
Case Summary
Appellant-Petitioner Matthew Ward applied for worker’s compensation benefits, claiming that pulmonary embolisms (“PEs”) he experienced in 2012 were caused by a work injury he suffered in 2010 while working for Appellee-Respon-dent Lowe’s. Although Ward supported his application with the opinion of a medical doctor, the Indiana Worker’s- Compensation Board (“the Board”) denied Ward’s application. Ward now appeals, contending that the Board abused its discretion in denying his application. Because we disagree, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
In 1995, Ward had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. CuppettIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Outlaw v. ERBRICH PRODUCTS CO., INCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Yarbrough v. Polar Ice & Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Pavese v. Cleaning SolutionsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- May v. ASHLEY F. WARD, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reiber v. MathewDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017