Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Hettel v. Security National Bank & Trust Co. in Duncan
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 16, 1996No. 82003PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice:
The issue presented on certiorari is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment because the evidentiary materials do not eliminate certain implicit fact issues concerning the legality of the bond issue and the disbursement of the bond proceeds. We find that it did.
FACTS
This cause concerns ad qui tam action 1 filed pursuant to 62 O.S.1991 §§ 372 and 373 2 by the appellant, G.E. Hettel (Het-tel), a resident taxpayer of Grady County, Oklahoma, against the Chickasha Bank & Trust Company (Chickasha) and four other banks — Security National Bank & Trust of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United States ex rel. Schumer v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Ross Ex Rel. Ross v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Ernst & YoungCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Green v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Brown v. City of Warr AcresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Smith v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.