Haney v. Lundie
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Dallas Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Charles Turner. Tbe appellant, -Elorence Y. Haney, by her nest friend, filed this bill against her husband, and one JB. M. Lundie and his wife. Appellant was a married woman, possessed of a statutory estate, consisting of certain lands in tbe city of Selma. Lundie also owned a bouse and lot in tbe same city.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Dallas Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Charles Turner. Tbe appellant, -Elorence Y. Haney, by her nest friend, filed this bill against her husband, and one JB. M. Lundie and his wife. Appellant was a married woman, possessed of a statutory estate, consisting of certain lands in tbe city of Selma. Lundie also owned a bouse and lot in tbe same city. After some negotiations between Lundie and appellant’s husband, it was agreed between Lundie and appellant and ber bus-band, to exchange lands, Haney giving $500 in county claims in addition to Mrs. Haney’s lot, for that of Lundie. In…
1Opinion of the CourtManning, J.
Admitting all the evidence which appellant’s counsel insist was admissible in her favor, and to which the assignments of error relate, yet we are compelled to the conclusion that she was not entitled to the relief prayed for, and that there was no error in the decree of the chancellor denying it. No good could arise from reproducing in this opinion the substance of the voluminous testimony, in the *102cause, for the purpose of showing that it authorized the decree ; it is sufficient to say that no impartial mind could, through this evidence, reach a different conclusion. That decree is therefore…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Balkum v. KellumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
- Askew v. RenfroeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Ridley v. EnnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Jones v. KnaussNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1880
- Gerace v. BentleySuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.