Wozniak & Padula, P.C. v. Gilmore, Rees, Carlson & Cataldo, P.C.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.
This action arises out of a dispute between two law firms as to whether the defendant firm, Gilmore, Rees, Carlson & Cataldo, P.C. (“Gilmore”), had a duty to account for and to reimburse the plaintiff firm, Wozniak and Padula, P.C. (“Wozniak”), for its fees and expenses for legal work done in a personal injury case.
Lisa Couch (“Couch”) initially retained Wozniak to represent her in a personal injury claim resulting from an automobile accident on October 23, 2001; she signed a contingent-fee agreement about a week after the accident. Wozniak continued to represent Couch until March 19,2003, at…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Nader v. CitronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Salamon v. TerraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Tetrault v. MahoneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Walsh v. Town of RandolphMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2005
- Trustees of Hunters Village Condominium Trust v. GerkeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007