Legal Opinion

Choate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 12, 1983No. 13180PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Movant filed a motion under Supreme Court Rule 27.26, seeking to have his conviction of forgery, following a guilty plea, set aside. Following an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the motion and movant appealed.

Movant requested oral argument in this court. When the matter was fully briefed we reviewed the record and the briefs and determined that oral argument would not be beneficial. Argument was denied and the case determined as if submitted on briefs. See this district’s Special Rule 1(e), Mo.Rules of Court 453 (14th ed. 1983).

Before sentencing, movant asked the trial court to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Medley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State v. ChoateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Molasky v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Watkins v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Royal v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Henderson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API