Legal Opinion
McCarty v. Brackenridge
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 19, 1892No. 6PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLARD, Associate Justice.
This is a suit by J. T. Brackenridge, the appellee, against Martin McCarty and his wife Josephine McCarty, on a promissory note for $2500 and interest, and to foreclose a lien on parts of lots 7 and 8 in block 122 in the city of Austin, and the improvements thereon.
The petition alleges that the plaintiff is the owner and the holder of the note; and besides many explanatory allegations concerning the execution of the note and the transaction between Brackenridge and McCarty creating the alleged lien, the petition is in the usual form.
The following are the conclusions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clements v. LacyTexas Supreme Court · 1879
- Hicks v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- White v. ShepperdTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- De Bruhl v. MaasTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Ruhl v. Kauffman & RungeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Floyd v. HammondTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Bagley v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Benavides v. Houston Ice & Brewing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Woods v. WestTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- First National Bank v. ZookNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.