Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Hammond

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1925No. 604-4089PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerman, P. J.

This suit as tried was one in the nature of trespass to try title, brought by W. W. Floyd against H. J. Hammond to recover lots 7 and 8 in block 123 in the town of Texline. We will refer to the parties as in the district court. Briefly the material facts may be summarized as follows :

Prior to October 1,1917, there was a verbal arrangement between plaintiff, Floyd, and defendant, Hammond, by which it was agreed that Hammond was to furnish as much as $4,000 to enable Floyd to purchase lots in £he town of Texline and to construct thereon suitable buildings to be used in conducting a garage and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PortwoodTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Robertson v. PaulTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  3. W. C. Belcher Land Mortgage Co. v. TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  4. Hemphill v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hicks v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1882

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Russell Durwood Daves, Debtor, Republicbank, Lubbock, N.A. v. Russell Durwood DavesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Bagley v. PollockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. American Guaranty, Inc. v. Miller (In Re Miller)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 1985
  4. Johnson v. TunstallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Baker v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API