Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Hawley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 25, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Eice county, Buckham, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after verdict for defendant, in an action for malicious prosecution.

1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.

The first assignment of error is that the verdict in defendant’s favor was not justified by the evidence, and is contrary to law. There was a controversy as to the ownership of the property in question, a team of horses, which had been delivered to plaintiff by defendant on a contract for the sale thereof, under which plaintiff claimed the right to hold them. A small portion only of the purchase-money had been paid. Plaintiff was discharged from defendant’s service, and there was a dispute between them about defendant’s right to the horses. He took them out of plaintiff’s possession by force,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stewart v. SonnebornSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Robinson v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Hall v. SuydamNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Webb v. Daggett & GreenNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Garrett v. MannheimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ton v. StetsonWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Merchant v. PielkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Goodman v. KleinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Johnson v. HuhnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API