Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 1, 2006No. 010634545, A118915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of attempted murder with a firearm, first-degree assault with a firearm, and felon in possession of a firearm. He challenges his convictions and sentences. We reject defendant’s challenges to his convictions without discussion.

With respect to his sentences, defendant argues that the trial court’s imposition of dangerous offender sentences was erroneous under Blakely v. Washington, 542 US 296, 124 S Ct 2531, 159 L Ed 2d 403 (2004), and Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 US 466, 120 S Ct 2348, 147 L Ed 2d 435 (2000), because the sentences were based on facts that were not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. State v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API