Quigley v. Bennett
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson, joined by Chief Justice Jefferson, Justice O’Neill, Justice Wainwright, and Justice Medina
In this case we consider whether evidence of the value of a royalty interest in minerals can be considered in determining compensation for geologic services when the services were not rendered pursuant to a written agreement. We determine that it cannot.
In early 1997, Michael Quigley decided to sell his interest in oil and gas leases known as the Samano leases. Robert Bennett, a geologist, agreed to help Quigley by analyzing the leases and assisting with a sales presentation to Louis Dreyfus Natural Gas. Bennett did not expect to be paid; he agreed to do the presentation as a favor to a sick…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Haase v. GlaznerTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Consolidated Gas & Equipment Co. of America v. ThompsonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Scott v. WalkerTexas Supreme Court · 1943
3Cited by49 opinions
- Albert G. Hill, Jr. v. Shamoun & Norman, LlpTexas Supreme Court · 2018
- James Cleveland v. Rob Taylor, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Bechtel Corp. v. CITGO PRODUCTS PIPELINE CO., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
- Siam v. BuildersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Quigley v. Bennett, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.