Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 29, 1931PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Circuit Judge :

— -The Attorney General of the State of Florida, on behalf of the State and on behalf of Hugh T’. Birch, Arthur T. Galt' and others, as eo-relators filed in this Court an information in the nature of quo warranto, seeking to oust the City of Fort Lauderdale from exercising municipal authority over, and from.taxing for municipal purposes, the lands of co-relators described in said information.

An amended information and an answer to the amended information was filed, to which demurrers were filed, respectively. The demurrers were overruled by the 'Court. The relators…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. State of Florida Ex Rel. Davis v. City of StuartSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  3. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. State Ex Rel. Davis v. City of Eau GallieSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Chapin v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. City of Avon ParkSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Harrington v. City of PompanoSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Landis v. Town of Boynton BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. City of South Miami v. State Ex Rel. LandisSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API