Legal Opinion

City of Rock Hill v. Hamm

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1962No. 18000PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Arthur Hamm, Jr, the appellant herein, was convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Rock Hill on June 29, 1960, of the charge of trepsass, in violation of Section 16-388(2) as is contained in the 1960 Cumulative Supplement to the 1952 Code of Laws of South Carolina. The judgment of conviction was affirmed on December 29, 1961, by the Honorable George T. Gregory, Jr, Resident Judge of the Sixth Circuit. This appeal followed.

The evidence shows that on June 7, 1960, the appellant along with Rev. C. A. Ivory, now deceased, entered the premises of McCrory’s Five and Ten Cent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Charleston v. MitchellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  2. City of Greenville v. PetersonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. City of Columbia v. BouieSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  4. City of Columbia v. BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Hamm v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API