Legal Opinion

Village of Constantine v. Michigan Gas & Electric Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. Docket No. 50, Calendar No. 41,418PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

The village of Constantine brings this suit to restrain defendant, Michigan Gas & Electric Company, from conducting a local business of an electric company within the village of Constantine.

The Michigan Gas & Electric Company was organized as of September 21, 1904, under the provisions of Act No. 232, Pub. Acts 1903, for a period of 30 years, under the name of Portage Lake Gas & Coke Company. This name was changed to Hough-ton County Gas & Coke Company on February 23, 1906, and that name was changed to Michigan Gas & Electric Company on March 29, 1917. About this time, the Michigan Gas &…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Russell v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Taggart ex rel. Mason v. PerkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Lansing v. Michigan Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. City of Covington v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tcg Detroit, (98-2034), (98-2035) v. City of Dearborn, (98-2034),third-Party (98-2035), Ameritech Michigan, Incorporated, Third-Party (98-2035)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Campbell v. Judges' Retirement BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Michigan Public Service Co. v. City of CheboyganMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  4. City of Marshall v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. TCG Detroit v. City of DearbornDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API